|
100 Point Rating Guide | ||
|---|---|---|
| 96-100 | Extraordinary | A wine of finesse, complexity, and expression. True to variety and region. Perfect balance of flavors with a long finish. |
| 90-95 | Excellent | True to variety and region, with terrific complexity and balance. While not a wine for the ages, a superior example. |
| 85-89 | Good | Meets your expectations, with sound flavors and balance. Might have limited complexity or be short on the palate. A sound wine. |
| 80-84 | Average | Drinkable, might not have as much varietal character. Simple flavors, no flaws, but nothing special. |
| 75-79 | Below Average | Might contain one flaw, simple straight-forward flavors, off-balance, unpleasant. |
| 60-74 | Undrinkable, Flawed | Contains significant flaws. Unpleasant, not commercially acceptable. |
| Need some help? | ||
You're not logged in! ... so we can't track this review for you.
Login or create a free account and we'll bring you right back. (or continue anonymously)
2 User Reviews
Aug 20, 2007
This wine has a very delicate mouthfeel, which might been a result of it's age and the hour or so it decanted. However, it tasted a bit "wet".
Contained hints of tomato, it was nice and spicy, with a relatively long finish.
Aug 06, 2007
Smells sweet and very heavy, dense. Tastes like it saw a LOT of oak, or rather (at this price range), like a lot of vanilla essence and sugar was mixed in, then some oak chips plopped in the tank. One-dimensional and feels engineered to non-wine-drinkers. After all that trash talking though ... it is still very drinkable, just not my style.
