|
100 Point Rating Guide | ||
|---|---|---|
| 96-100 | Extraordinary | A wine of finesse, complexity, and expression. True to variety and region. Perfect balance of flavors with a long finish. |
| 90-95 | Excellent | True to variety and region, with terrific complexity and balance. While not a wine for the ages, a superior example. |
| 85-89 | Good | Meets your expectations, with sound flavors and balance. Might have limited complexity or be short on the palate. A sound wine. |
| 80-84 | Average | Drinkable, might not have as much varietal character. Simple flavors, no flaws, but nothing special. |
| 75-79 | Below Average | Might contain one flaw, simple straight-forward flavors, off-balance, unpleasant. |
| 60-74 | Undrinkable, Flawed | Contains significant flaws. Unpleasant, not commercially acceptable. |
| Need some help? | ||
You're not logged in! ... so we can't track this review for you.
Login or create a free account and we'll bring you right back. (or continue anonymously)
8 User Reviews
Mar 31, 2007
Oaky vanilla and smooth. Didn't like it too much. Had a fairly nice and thick mouthfeel, but overall a bit too sweet and oaked out.
Mar 30, 2007
Color was beet/purple-y. If this wine were edible, this would be californian comfrot food. So well-rounded aroma w/ sweet perfume. Tastes slightly sweet at first, and then transitions to an airy/savory thing? (Diana Lee)
Mar 30, 2007
Subdued nose, blueberry, strawberry, chocolate -- but just fleeting glimpses. Very weak. After a few more pours seemed to be opening up a bit, needs time/decanting? Some olives on the nose and tip of tounge.
