|
100 Point Rating Guide | ||
|---|---|---|
| 96-100 | Extraordinary | A wine of finesse, complexity, and expression. True to variety and region. Perfect balance of flavors with a long finish. |
| 90-95 | Excellent | True to variety and region, with terrific complexity and balance. While not a wine for the ages, a superior example. |
| 85-89 | Good | Meets your expectations, with sound flavors and balance. Might have limited complexity or be short on the palate. A sound wine. |
| 80-84 | Average | Drinkable, might not have as much varietal character. Simple flavors, no flaws, but nothing special. |
| 75-79 | Below Average | Might contain one flaw, simple straight-forward flavors, off-balance, unpleasant. |
| 60-74 | Undrinkable, Flawed | Contains significant flaws. Unpleasant, not commercially acceptable. |
| Need some help? | ||
You're not logged in! ... so we can't track this review for you.
Login or create a free account and we'll bring you right back. (or continue anonymously)
3 User Reviews
Apr 06, 2007
A weak nose and a very light mouthfeel. Nonetheless, i think they accomplished what they set out to do: make a cheap drinkable wine.
Warning! This wine tastes a bit like two buck chuck. I.e., raisin/plum on the nose, and thin yet still somewhat coating mouthfeel.
Nonetheless, an OK bang for your buck. Enjoy w/ caution.
Apr 06, 2007
Nose is sugar and cinnamon, prob too sweet. The good thing is that goes away on the taste. Vanilla, berry, with a nice mouthfeel. The finish is slightly thin but still good.
