|
100 Point Rating Guide | ||
|---|---|---|
| 96-100 | Extraordinary | A wine of finesse, complexity, and expression. True to variety and region. Perfect balance of flavors with a long finish. |
| 90-95 | Excellent | True to variety and region, with terrific complexity and balance. While not a wine for the ages, a superior example. |
| 85-89 | Good | Meets your expectations, with sound flavors and balance. Might have limited complexity or be short on the palate. A sound wine. |
| 80-84 | Average | Drinkable, might not have as much varietal character. Simple flavors, no flaws, but nothing special. |
| 75-79 | Below Average | Might contain one flaw, simple straight-forward flavors, off-balance, unpleasant. |
| 60-74 | Undrinkable, Flawed | Contains significant flaws. Unpleasant, not commercially acceptable. |
| Need some help? | ||
You're not logged in! ... so we can't track this review for you.
Login or create a free account and we'll bring you right back. (or continue anonymously)
10 User Reviews
Aug 14, 2007
Like the diluted piss of an exotic animal. Life is too precious to waste it drinking wines like this. Spend the extra few bucks and get something decent.
I feel guilty even wasting my breath on this, let alone the ink, but I think you all need a scolding for wasting your milk money here.
I seriously doubt anyone who buys plonk like this will bother to check a review before charging into the sea like a filthy lemming.
Apr 12, 2007
Subtler, softer nose, brighter color. Lighter dilute palate, would say it was overcropped. A fair rendition but way below the Clos du Bois tasted initially. Tasted blind -- Italian??
Apr 12, 2007
Tart and sour. Not dry enough for a pinot grigio. Not very balanced overall.
Apr 12, 2007
Slightly deeper color than the Clos du Bois PG, medium aroma. Taste citrusy, short finish. (Liz W)
Apr 12, 2007
Nose: floral, a little wet underbrush. Taste: too much acid and vegetable taste.
Forum Posts (2 topics, 2 posts)
|
||
|
